bellinghman: (Suomynona)
bellinghman ([personal profile] bellinghman) wrote2007-05-23 09:44 am
Entry tags:

Today's update

So today, we see WoW 2.1. Roughly 385MB of update, with a details list longer than I've seen in absolutely ages.

ETA: I should clarify that, being 2.1, this is not a set of bugfixes - this is major extra content, the first since the release of Burning Crusade.

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2007-05-23 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
The 100% figure in the patch notes means you should get at least a green gem on every prospect - no more prospects that only give powder. It's not clear yet what the new rate of blue gems is. Used to be 60%, it's supposed to be substantially up from that.

Will see how prices settle this evening and the next few days before I start flooding the market. Don't push it down to 50g if you don't have to! Or I'll swallow your soul.

[identity profile] gmh.livejournal.com 2007-05-23 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)
no more prospects that only give powder

Do you mean that every stack should have at least one green gem, or that every prospect (of 5 ore) should give you one gem?

I've had a fair old number of powder-only prospects today; not over an entire stack, though - and on average I get a greenie per prospect.

As for the pricing; I'm mainly trying to build up a cash reserve for when the new recipes hit the AH; I imagine they're going to be pricy.

[identity profile] songster.livejournal.com 2007-05-23 01:55 pm (UTC)(link)
According to the patch notes, "Prospecting now always yields at least 1 gem". So you shouldn't be seeing any powder-only prospects. Coupled with the fact that you haven't seen a drastic change from pre-patch numbers of rare gems, I wonder if this is a change that didn't actually make it.

What's the vendor value of the uncommon gems now? It's supposed to drop to 25s.

[identity profile] gmh.livejournal.com 2007-05-23 02:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Vendor value has reduced to 25s; it may be that I was just a little unlucky with the ore I prospected this morning.