bellinghman: (Default)
bellinghman ([personal profile] bellinghman) wrote2009-08-19 04:55 pm
Entry tags:

Life support is heavy

Inspired by a post by [livejournal.com profile] major_clanger, it's interesting to note fuel consumption for crossing Canada.

On the way out, The Canadian train from Toronto to Vancouver: 72,000 litres of diesel.
On the way back, WestJet 737-700 from Vancouver to Montreal (which is further): 13,000 litres of jet fuel.

The 737 carries 140 passengers.
I'm under the impression that The Canadian carries about 250 passengers in total, though I can't actually find figures.

Conclusion: per passenger mile, extreme long distance trains can end up burning more fuel than planes, due to the train carrying along bunk beds, showers, kitchens, etc., etc.

Edit: [livejournal.com profile] crazyscot pointed out some corrections, with most importantly the plane drinking about half what I'd assumed.

[identity profile] liasbluestone.livejournal.com 2009-08-19 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting and largely irrelevant factoid from my bygone days in the Airline booking industry:

Japanese domestic carriers, which tend to carry large numbers of passengers on short island-hops, use custom 747s with modified undercarriage to allow them to land with a full load of fuel.