bellinghman (
bellinghman) wrote2007-01-31 09:41 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You gotta love archaeologists.
"It is the richest - by that I mean the filthiest - site of this period known in Britain,"
Now why don't parents see it this way? Not cleanliness is next to godliness, but messiness is next to wealth.
Now why don't parents see it this way? Not cleanliness is next to godliness, but messiness is next to wealth.
no subject
no subject
(Too long I've been a southern wuss. Well, since I was born, but Mother, she was Yorkshire.)
no subject
no subject
(I note that the latest evidence from the Nullarbor plain in .au rather tends to indicate that the aboriginal inhabitants of the area were responsible for the mass extinction of everything slower than the ground kangaroos. Well, that's another enviromental woo candidate gone.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-01-31 01:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
On the other hand, I can prove there is no elephant in my garden by dint of an exhaustive search of every cubic foot of it, and determining that the properties of that cubic foot are incompatible with it being part of an elephant, and that it is impossible for an elephant to occupy less than a cubic foot.
Similarly, if for the entirety of human history/prehistory, for the entirety of human range, there is evidence of humans not being environmental angels, I thing we can justifiably assume that such angels never existed, at least not to any appreciable extent.
(Managing that exhaustive search is an exercise for the archaeologist. I shall just stand back here out of throwing range, shall I? Oh, so you're using a woomera, huh? Well, one moment, I shall move even further back!)
no subject
I think he's training to be a scientist. Certainly getting there on the solipsism front :)
no subject
Ah, he's getting all growed up!
Broomsticks..
Mwahahahahaha..
:-)
no subject