![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There's a meme currently going round - it's one of those multiple question interview ones. Among its questions are:
If you could bring back anyone that has passed, who would it be?
I'm sorry, but if I ever encounter the author of that question, I'll have to give her a real bitch slapping. 'has passed'? For fuck's sake, are you talking about someone going past you in the street? Yes? No? No, I thought not.
You're talking about death. There's a good, short word you could have used, one that takes less typing. It's 'died'. Don't pretend it doesn't occur - it does. To all of us - no-one gets out of this alive. This sort of milquetoast euphemism is an attempt to deny one of life's most basic features.
Aarrgghh!!
If you could bring back anyone that has passed, who would it be?
I'm sorry, but if I ever encounter the author of that question, I'll have to give her a real bitch slapping. 'has passed'? For fuck's sake, are you talking about someone going past you in the street? Yes? No? No, I thought not.
You're talking about death. There's a good, short word you could have used, one that takes less typing. It's 'died'. Don't pretend it doesn't occur - it does. To all of us - no-one gets out of this alive. This sort of milquetoast euphemism is an attempt to deny one of life's most basic features.
Aarrgghh!!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:52 am (UTC)I'll admit that 'passed' jars just a little more, because it's more uncommon, and being unusual, stands out more.
I can also understand someone in the immediate first stage of the denial-grief-acceptance cycle wanting to use 'passed away'. But that's not the case here. This is not a meme about recent bereavement. This is a question asking about a potential pool of tens of billions of the differently metabolising.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 12:02 pm (UTC)Ahahaha...
I've got to pass that on...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:45 am (UTC)It jars for me too, but not as much as bitch slapping does, and in an international cultural melee you have to make allowances for cultural difference.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 12:05 pm (UTC)No. But in my experience (and I'll concede I haven't encountered everyone in the world) those that do use such language are all female. And called Sophie.
As for optimising for upset - consider this part of the feedback mechanism.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:31 pm (UTC)Your rant is impressive and justified.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:53 am (UTC)When I'm dictator of the word, I shall insist that all restrooms have at least one chaise longue.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 10:30 am (UTC)Oh, although I guess as dictator you won't need voting in.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 10:51 am (UTC)It's re-election
wethey tend not to worry about.no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 11:22 am (UTC)(I suspect that Gaiman's Death is slightly more appropriate for this image than Pratchett's.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-25 12:56 pm (UTC)Death, the final answer
Date: 2007-09-25 02:04 pm (UTC)And of course, I have to condole with the bereaved when I have never met their relative, and have no personal feeling for them - and I am a person that finds it difficult to express a feeling that I do not have. The closest I can get is sympathy, and the artificial sympathy so often expressed at this time would make my teeth grate.
Sometimes I try a sympathetic enquiry, and depending on my rough estimate of age, distress and social background of the bereaved person I might use the word "passed" usually (because I am English) with "away" afterwards. Or if discussing death in general terms might say "on his passing". There are some who find the subject too distressing to contemplate - the present horror is enough without people becoming too clinical and and businesslike. I am fairly sure that some find it macabre for a person to talk in objective terms because it can almost seem like revelling in the fact, and failing to show either enough respect for the deceased, or for the bereaved.
I get it wrong: because there is such a lot of information that needs to be collected, I sometimes fail to show adequate sympathy, and cause offence. I can be absolutely sure, however, that people's attitude towards death (when they come to see me) is usually highly emotive, and that few can discuss the matter objectively.
So, from professional experience, I would not dismiss the euphemism - when writing for a wide audience, it may cause less offence.
Re: Death, the final answer
Date: 2007-09-25 11:05 pm (UTC)(As opposed to my mother, who all too frequently speaks to those about to bereave others, IYSWIM. Samaritans get quite a snarly sense of humour.)
In this case, if the author for one minute really thinks people are going to be upset by the subject of death, then she or he should never have raised it in the first place.
(I just had a mental image of Ricky Gervaise doing standup then. Sorry.)